Re: 0/1 vs true/false
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 0/1 vs true/false |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13797.1058977969@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 0/1 vs true/false ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 0/1 vs true/false
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes: > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote: >> Well, there is no boolean type per se in SQL92. But there is in SQL99. > Was it pulled from SQL92 before it went standard? My copy of the > pre-release lists a boolean type, just like the 99 standard does. Where? SQL92 says nothing about a declarable boolean datatype that I can see. They're a bit schizophrenic in that they do define a lot of operators that are described as returning boolean ... but you cannot create a column of type boolean, nor is there a boolean-literal construct. AFAICS, boolean values can only exist "in flight" between operators and a WHERE or HAVING clause in SQL92. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: