Re: record identical operator
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: record identical operator |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1379110400.48994.YahooMailNeo@web162902.mail.bf1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: record identical operator (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: record identical operator
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I am not actually that concerned with MVCs using this, you're quite > capable of analyzing the dangers. What I am wary of is exposing an > operator that's basically broken from the get go to SQL. > Now, the obvious issue there is that matviews use SQL to refresh :( I'm not sure why these operators are more broken or dangerous than those which already exist to support the text_pattern_ops and bpchar_pattern_ops operator families. I could overload those operator names as much as possible if that seems better. As I said at the start of the thread, I have no particular attachment to these operator names. For example, that would mean using ~>=~ as the operator for record_image_ge() instead of using >==. It would be trivial to make that adjustment to the patch. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: