Re: Using wildcard for table name ?
| От | Francisco Leovey |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Using wildcard for table name ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1375098235.34701.YahooMailNeo@web164906.mail.bf1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Using wildcard for table name ? (Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it>) |
| Список | pgsql-novice |
OK Luca you are right, a view is a good solution. Thank you
From: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it>
To: Francisco Leovey <fleovey@yahoo.com>
Cc: "pgsql-novice@postgresql.org" <pgsql-novice@postgresql.org>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Using wildcard for table name ?
To: Francisco Leovey <fleovey@yahoo.com>
Cc: "pgsql-novice@postgresql.org" <pgsql-novice@postgresql.org>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Using wildcard for table name ?
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Francisco Leovey <fleovey@yahoo.com> wrote:
> My question was solved by writing a Perl program that gets the table names
> as a list from the database structure and then simply searching each table.
> Years ago I worked with Informix and there was a syntax for using a variable
Will I believe partitioning is a better idea, why don't you provide a
view that unions all the table you are interested in? So far it will
be a consisnte SQL interface and you will not need any external
application.
Luca
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: