Re: Differences in WHERE clause of SELECT
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Differences in WHERE clause of SELECT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1374006163.42385.YahooMailNeo@web162903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Differences in WHERE clause of SELECT (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Differences in WHERE clause of SELECT
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > We can certainly continue to play whack-a-mole and dream up a new > solution every time a really intolerable variant of this problem comes > up. But that doesn't seem good to me. It means that every case > behaves a little different from every other case, and the whole thing > is kinda arcane and hard to understand, even for hackers. If you're building up a list of things that generate errors in PostgreSQL but not other DBMS products, make sure you have this: test=# create table t(d date); CREATE TABLE test=# insert into t values (NULL); INSERT 0 1 test=# insert into t values (COALESCE(NULL, NULL)); ERROR: column "d" is of type date but expression is of type text LINE 1: insert into t values (COALESCE(NULL, NULL)); ^ HINT: You will need to rewrite or cast the expression. From a user perspective, it's hard to explain why COALESCE(NULL, NULL) fails in a location that a bare NULL works. From the perspective of those working on the code, and looking at the problem from the inside out, it seems sane; but that's the only perspective from which it does. -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: