Re: Semi-Pseudo Data Types & Procedure Arguments
От | David Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Semi-Pseudo Data Types & Procedure Arguments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1372262005343-5761175.post@n5.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Semi-Pseudo Data Types & Procedure Arguments (David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
David Johnston wrote > > Tom Lane-2 wrote >> >>> -- A stored procedure which can accept two argument, which can be a >>> single >>> integer field, or an array of integers. >> >> Those two cases seem unlikely to be supportable by the same >> implementation, so it seems more likely that what you'd be doing is just >> overloading the function name with two instances, my_fn(int) and >> my_fn(int[]). > Isn't this scenario why VARIDIC was implemented: > > CREATE FUNCTION my_fn( VARIADIC in_ordered_actual varchar[] ) .... > > The single value input is simply a special case of an array of size 1. > Depending on whether you allow an empty array you might want to: > > CREATE FUNCTION my_fn(required_first varchar, VARIADIC optional_others > varchar[] DEFAULT '{}'::varchar[]) ... > > Then join the two values together and move on to processing. > > You would still need separate functions for numbers versus strings. > > David J. So my thoughts stand for generating ideas but you cannot actually supply an array as an input to a VARIDIC routine; it simply allows for an unknown number of inputs (of the same type) and constructs an array internally for the function to use. David J. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Semi-Pseudo-Data-Types-Procedure-Arguments-tp5761158p5761175.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: