Re: [HACKERS] non-functional update notice unneccesarily

There are times when the message is appropriate, I believe.  But this
is not one of them.  Are all instances of this message gone, or just
this one?

On Mon, 15 June 1998, at 22:51:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > update mempayment set paywho = 'icvproxy' from do_addpayment where dappays
> > eq = payseqid;
> > NOTICE:  Non-functional update, only first update is performed
> > UPDATE 31
> >
> > more than one update was indeed performed..
> > I beleive this has happened to me before..
> >
> >
>
> Vadim has said to remove the message, and I have done so.  The
> surrounding code in heapam.c is unchanged, just the elog(NOTICE) is
> commented out.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
> maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)
>