Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-)
От | adrobj |
---|---|
Тема | Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13700848.post@talk.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-)
Re: Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
This is probably a FAQ, but I can't find a good answer... So - are there common techniques to compensate for the lack of clustered/covering indexes in PostgreSQL? To be more specific - here is my table (simplified): topic_id int post_id int post_text varchar(1024) The most used query is: SELECT post_id, post_text FROM Posts WHERE topic_id=XXX. Normally I would have created a clustered index on topic_id, and the whole query would take ~1 disk seek. What would be the common way to handle this in PostgreSQL, provided that I can't afford 1 disk seek per record returned? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Clustered-covering-indexes-%28or-lack-thereof-%3A-%29-tf4789321.html#a13700848 Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: