Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server
| От | luis.roberto@siscobra.com.br |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1368981627.1376962.1620317467043.JavaMail.zimbra@siscobra.com.br обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server (Semen Yefimenko <semen.yefimenko@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
----- Mensagem original ----- > De: "Semen Yefimenko" <semen.yefimenko@gmail.com> > Para: "pgsql-performance" <pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org> > Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 6 de maio de 2021 11:38:39 > Assunto: Very slow Query compared to Oracle / SQL - Server > SELECT column1,..., column54 where ((entrytype = 4000 or entrytype = 4001 or > entrytype = 4002) and (archivestatus <= 1)) order by timestampcol desc; The first thing I would try is rewriting the query to: SELECT column1,..., column54 FROM logtable WHERE (entrytype in (4000,4001,4002)) AND (archivestatus <= 1)) ORDER BY timestampcol DESC; Check if that makes a difference... Luis R. Weck
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: