comm patch & ssl patch
От | Brett McCormick |
---|---|
Тема | comm patch & ssl patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13678.10218.418679.798816@web0.speakeasy.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] comm patch & ssl patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I've decided to make two separate patches, a "communication" patch to clean up the fe-be communication (to be submitted for inclusion) and then a separate SSL patch. this is good because, if approved for merging, will clear up a lot of inconsistency regarding the io communication in the backend and frontend. it also has the added benefit of making my SSL patch less hack-ish. I haven't heard much from you guys regarding the backend communication, but I figure if I make a good patch that doesn't interfere and has positive changes, what have we got to lose. I'm considering going as far as making it more even more modular so that it is easier for other people to take advantage of that, but I'm not sure how anyone feels about that. First things first I guess. btw, i'm still planning on implementing stored procedures in perl. i'd like to gauge the relative interest of these two projects so I can decide how to spend my time.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: