Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an ancient oversight in libpq's handling of V3-protocol COPY
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an ancient oversight in libpq's handling of V3-protocol COPY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13674.1200433077@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an ancient oversight in libpq's handling of V3-protocol COPY
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an ancient oversight in libpq's handling of V3-protocol COPY |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 18:46 +0000, Tom Lane wrote: >> Fix an ancient oversight in libpq's handling of V3-protocol COPY OUT mode: >> we need to be able to swallow NOTICE messages, and potentially also >> ParameterStatus messages (although the latter would be a bit weird), >> without exiting COPY OUT state. Fix it, and adjust the protocol documentation >> to emphasize the need for this. Per off-list report from Alexander Galler. > My reading of this is that previously a PQgetCopyData() operation would > fail mysteriously because of > i) a reload of postgresql.conf, following the setting of any of the > following parameters client_encoding, DateStyle, TimeZone, and > standard_conforming_strings. > ii) any previous LISTEN command on the session running the COPY Neither of those events could trigger it, because neither would be processed midstream during a COPY (in the current code, anyway). As best I can tell: * NOTICE messages are a risk, especially if you have a more-verbose- than-normal client_min_messages setting. * ParameterStatus could be a risk if a function executed during COPY tried to change one of the above-mentioned parameters. Since COPY OUT doesn't fire triggers, I think user-defined datatype output functions would be the only possible candidates for that. * LISTEN/NOTIFY isn't a risk because the backend only sends NOTIFY at transaction end, period. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: