Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13673.1502733657@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes: >>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>>> I do not think it is CREATE COLLATION's job to provide a comment; >>>> no other CREATE command does so. > I must admit that I missed that the description was cataloged as a > comment. Is it out of the question to add another column to > pg_collation, that just always has the ICU-provided description? These > seem like separate concerns to me. That seems like a reasonable solution to me, if it's not too late for another catversion bump. I like it better than the auto-comment thing Peter E. suggests nearby. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: