Re: *Proper* solution for 1..* relationship?
От | David Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: *Proper* solution for 1..* relationship? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1366980905007-5753392.post@n5.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | *Proper* solution for 1..* relationship? (Wolfgang Keller <feliphil@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Wolfgang Keller-2 wrote > It hit me today that a 1..* relationship can't be implemented just by a > single foreign key constraint. I must have been sleeping very deeply not > to notice this. > > E.g. there is a table "list" and another table "list_item" and the > relationship can be described as "every list has at least one > list_item" (and every list_item can only be part of one list, but > this is trivial). Change the cardinality to "0..*" ? If you want to enforce a view of the data the ensures "1..*" (for list) then create a view of "list" where only those entries with values in "list_item" are shown. Alternately you might simply add a counter column to the list table and use triggers to increment/decrement the "item_count". David J. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Proper-solution-for-1-relationship-tp5753384p5753392.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - novice mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: