Re: Save a few bytes in pg_attribute

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Save a few bytes in pg_attribute
Дата
Msg-id 1363703.1679424905@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Save a few bytes in pg_attribute  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Save a few bytes in pg_attribute  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> FWIW, I think we should consider getting rid of attcacheoff. I doubt it's
> worth its weight these days, because deforming via slots starts at the
> beginning anyway. The overhead of maintaining it is not insubstantial, and
> it's just architecturally ugly to to update tupledescs continually.

I'd be for that if we can convince ourselves there's not a material
speed penalty.  As you say, it's quite ugly.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Progress report of CREATE INDEX for nested partitioned tables
Следующее
От: Matthias van de Meent
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Save a few bytes in pg_attribute