Re: Materialized views WIP patch
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1361374105.73929.YahooMailNeo@web162903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Materialized views WIP patch (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > I suppose one should be able to expect that if one finds a view > in the information schema, then one should be able to use DROP > VIEW to remove it. Which in this case wouldn't work. So I don't > think including a materialized view under views or tables is > appropriate. Right. I think adding pg_matviews covers the stated use-case enough to answer Erik's concern. I'm not going to mess with adding non-standard stuff to the standard views. -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: