Re: [PATCH] Compile without warning with gcc's -Wtype-limits, -Wempty-body

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [PATCH] Compile without warning with gcc's -Wtype-limits, -Wempty-body
Дата
Msg-id 1358213945.401.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [PATCH] Compile without warning with gcc's -Wtype-limits, -Wempty-body  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Compile without warning with gcc's -Wtype-limits, -Wempty-body
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 00:29 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> Independently from this patch, should we add -Wtype-limits to the
> default parameters?

I think we have had a discussion along this line before.  I am against
fixing warnings from this option, because those changes would hide
errors if a variable's type changed from signed to unsigned or vice
versa, which could happen because of refactoring or it might be
dependent on system headers.

FWIW, clang has the same warning on by default.  There, it's called
-Wtautological-compare.

I'm less concerned about -Wempty-body, but I can't see the practical use
either way.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: