Re: Rejecting weak passwords
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rejecting weak passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13579.1255533115@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rejecting weak passwords (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Re: Rejecting weak passwords |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes: > I would suggest that in addition to the proposed plugin, we add an > suset GUC (defaulting to OFF) which rejects any use of WITH ENCRYPTED > PASSWORD to ensure that the password complexity can be checked when > roles are created or modified. That's going to stop us from being beat up? A GUC that forcibly *weakens* security? I can't see it. If you're really intent on making that happen, you can have your password checker plugin reject crypted passwords; we don't need such a questionable rule in core. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: