Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13565.1170990926@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom CommandIDs,updated patch
Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Simon Riggs wrote: >> Combo is OK, because it's a *combination* of two CommandIds. >> >> That means they are ComboCommandIds or CCIs. > CCI is CommandCounterIncrement to me, so let's not use that > abbreviation. Agreed. I looked for a bit at adding a separate typedef ComboCommandId to be used where a cid was definitely a combo cid, but it didn't seem to be very useful to do that... I'm testing the patch currently. I was a bit surprised to find the without_oid test failing, but it makes sense because I'm using a MAXALIGN=8 machine. I suppose Heikki tested on MAXALIGN=4. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: