Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 135634.1659139371@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 7:16 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I am suspicious that the problem stems from the nonstandard >> way you've invoked psql to collect the horizon data. > Well, I just copied the pg_dump block which occurs directly beforehand > and modified it. I think that must take care of setting the path > properly, else we'd have things blowing up all over the place. But the > lack of -X could be an issue. Hmm. Now that I look, I do see two pre-existing "naked" invocations of psql in 002_pg_upgrade.pl, ie $oldnode->command_ok([ 'psql', '-X', '-f', $olddumpfile, 'postgres' ], 'loaded old dump file'); $oldnode->command_ok( [ 'psql', '-X', '-f', "$srcdir/src/bin/pg_upgrade/upgrade_adapt.sql", 'regression' ], 'ran adapt script'); Those suggest that maybe all you need is -X. However, I don't think either of those calls is reached by the majority of buildfarm animals, only ones that are doing cross-version-upgrade tests. So there could be more secret sauce needed to get this to pass everywhere. Personally I'd try to replace the two horizon-collection steps with $newnode->psql calls, using extra_params to inject the '-o' and target filename command line words. But if you want to try adding -X as a quicker answer, maybe that will be enough. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: