Re: Fix foreign key constraint check for partitioned tables

Hadi Moshayedi <hadi@moshayedi.net> writes:
> [ fix-foreign-key-check.patch ]

Pushed with some adjustments, as discussed over at
https://postgr.es/m/19030.1554574075@sss.pgh.pa.us

> This patch also changed the output of some of tests, i.e. previously
> foreign key constraint failures errored on the partitioned table itself,
> but now it shows the child table's name in the error message. I hope it is
> ok.

Yeah, I think that's OK.  Interestingly, no such changes appear in
HEAD's version of the regression test --- probably Alvaro's earlier
changes had the same effect.

> I also added a regression test which would fail without this patch.

This needed a fair amount of work.  You shouldn't have summarily
dropped a table that the test script specifically says it meant
to leave around, and we have a convention that role names created by
the regression test scripts always should begin with "regress_",
and you didn't clean up the role at the end (which would lead to
failures in repeated installcheck runs).

            regards, tom lane