Re: Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?
Дата
Msg-id 13522.1255284019@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?  (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> writes:
> BTW: how do other databases deal with this? Anything of relevance in the
> SQL standards?

SQL99 treats FOR UPDATE as an attribute of DECLARE CURSOR, so there's
no way for it to appear in a sub-select per spec.  (In general our
approach to FOR UPDATE is only loosely related to what the spec
thinks it does ...)
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Markus Wanner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is FOR UPDATE an optimization fence?
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: man pages