Re: The Contrib Roundup (long)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The Contrib Roundup (long) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13503.1118263641@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The Contrib Roundup (long) ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I think this is out of the question both because these categories are fuzzy >> and it would destroy the CVS history. > Why would it destroy the history? Its easy enough to move the files to a > subdirectory without losing any history ... hell, we did it when we moved > JDBC/ODBC out of core, the history was maintained ... I don't think you can just move the files --- that will break future builds of the back branches (unless you intend to make the rearrangement retroactive). I agree with Peter's point anyway: the main value of classifying these things is for documentation, and just structuring the top-level README that way would be sufficient. Physically changing the hierarchy is just much more work than it's worth. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: