Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1348757745-sup-1839@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of jue sep 27 06:51:28 -0300 2012: > On 26 September 2012 15:47, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > > Really, as far as autovacuum is concerned, it would be much more useful > > to be able to reliably detect that a table has been recently vacuumed, > > without having to request a 10ms-recent pgstat snapshot. That would > > greatly reduce the amount of time autovac spends on pgstat requests. > > VACUUMing generates a relcache invalidation. Can we arrange for those > invalidations to be received by autovac launcher, so it gets immediate > feedback of recent activity without polling? Hmm, this is an interesting idea worth exploring, I think. Maybe we should sort tables in the autovac worker to-do list by age of last invalidation messages received, or something like that. Totally unclear on the details, but as I said, worth exploring. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: