Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1348673153-sup-4361@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: autovacuum stress-testing our system
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Euler Taveira's message of mié sep 26 11:53:27 -0300 2012: > On 26-09-2012 09:43, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > 5) splitting the single stat file into multiple pieces - e.g. per database, > > written separately, so that the autovacuum workers don't need to read all > > the data even for databases that don't need to be vacuumed. This might be > > combined with (4). > > > IMHO that's the definitive solution. It would be one file per database plus a > global one. That way, the check would only read the global.stat and process > those database that were modified. Also, an in-memory map could store that > information to speed up the checks. +1 > The only downside I can see is that you > will increase the number of opened file descriptors. Note that most users of pgstat will only have two files open (instead of one as currently) -- one for shared, one for their own database. Only pgstat itself and autovac launcher would need to open pgstat files for all databases; but both do not have a need to open other files (arbitrary tables) so this shouldn't be a major problem. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: