Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1346850584-sup-7621@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API
changes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of mié sep 05 08:30:37 -0300 2012: > 2012/9/3 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>: > > Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of dom sep 02 15:53:22 -0300 2012: > >> This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest > >> core API changes. > > > > I think you should get a buildfarm animal installed that builds and > > tests sepgsql, to avoid this kind of problem in the future. > > > Thanks for your suggestion. I'm interested in. > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Buildfarm_Howto > > Does it test only build-correctness? Or, is it possible to include > result of regression test for result to be alarmed? Yes, regression test diffs are also reported and can cause failures. As far as I know, you can construct your own test steps, if you want to do something customized that's not present in regular BF animals. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: