Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1345127470-sup-2641@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of jue ago 02 10:48:02 -0400 2012: > > "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > > > Don't forget the peculiarities of columns with record types. > > I forgot to include the type creation in the example: > > test=# create type a as (a1 int, a2 int); > CREATE TYPE Thanks for the example. After playing with this, I think that a NOT NULL constraint attached to a column with a composite type is equivalent to a CHECK (col IS DISTINCT FROM NULL); at least they seem to behave identically. Is that what you would expect? This seems a bit complicated to handle with the way I'm doing things today; at parse analysis time, when my current code is creating the check constraint, we don't know anything about the type of the column IIRC. Maybe I will have to delay creating the constraint until execution. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: