Re: -Wformat-zero-length
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: -Wformat-zero-length |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1344350312-sup-6268@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: -Wformat-zero-length (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: -Wformat-zero-length
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie ago 03 16:02:28 -0400 2012: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 04:01:18PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > >> I don't disagree with pg_upgrade being operationally complex, but I > > >> don't see how this relates to contrib vs. non-contrib at all. Are we > > >> supposed to only have "simple" programs in src/bin? That seems a > > >> strange policy. > > > > > > Well, perhaps we need to re-open the discussion then. > > > > I feel like putting it in src/bin would carry an implication of > > robustness that I'm not sanguine about. Granted, putting it in > > contrib has already pushed the envelope in that direction further than > > is perhaps warranted. But ISTM that if we ever want to put this in > > src/bin someone needs to devote some serious engineering time to > > filing down the rough edges. > > I don't know how to file down any of the existing rough edges. So do you have a list of rough edges? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: