Re: pg_basebackup failed to back up large file
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup failed to back up large file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13437.1401807898@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup failed to back up large file (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup failed to back up large file
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> There's a far bigger problem there, which is if we're afraid that >> current_len_left might exceed 4GB then what is it exactly that guarantees >> it'll fit in an 11-digit field? > Well, we will only write 11 digits in there, that's when we read it. But > print_val() on the server side should probably have an overflow check > there, which it doesn't. It's going to write some strange values int here > if it overflows.. My point is that having backups crash on an overflow doesn't really seem acceptable. IMO we need to reconsider the basebackup protocol and make sure we don't *need* to put values over 4GB into this field. Where's the requirement coming from anyway --- surely all files in PGDATA ought to be 1GB max? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: