Re: INFORMATION_SCHEMA.routines column routine_definition does not show the source
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: INFORMATION_SCHEMA.routines column routine_definition does not show the source |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 134216.1635957998@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: INFORMATION_SCHEMA.routines column routine_definition does not show the source ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: INFORMATION_SCHEMA.routines column routine_definition does not show the source
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> The information schema query consults pg_proc.prosrc directly instead of
> calling pg_get_functiondef(...) (which didn't exist when the original query
> was written, and hasn't been wrong until now).
pg_get_functiondef would produce more than we want, but it looks like
pg_get_function_sqlbody() would do.
BTW, while researching this I noted the header comment for
pg_get_functiondef:
* Note: if you change the output format of this function, be careful not
* to break psql's rules (in \ef and \sf) for identifying the start of the
* function body. To wit: the function body starts on a line that begins
* with "AS ", and no preceding line will look like that.
Needless to say, the SQL-function-body patch has ignored this advice
totally. At the very least this comment needs to be adjusted, but
I wonder if it's not telling us that \ef and/or \sf are broken.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: