Re: INFORMATION_SCHEMA.routines column routine_definition does not show the source
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INFORMATION_SCHEMA.routines column routine_definition does not show the source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 134216.1635957998@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: INFORMATION_SCHEMA.routines column routine_definition does not show the source ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: INFORMATION_SCHEMA.routines column routine_definition does not show the source
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > The information schema query consults pg_proc.prosrc directly instead of > calling pg_get_functiondef(...) (which didn't exist when the original query > was written, and hasn't been wrong until now). pg_get_functiondef would produce more than we want, but it looks like pg_get_function_sqlbody() would do. BTW, while researching this I noted the header comment for pg_get_functiondef: * Note: if you change the output format of this function, be careful not * to break psql's rules (in \ef and \sf) for identifying the start of the * function body. To wit: the function body starts on a line that begins * with "AS ", and no preceding line will look like that. Needless to say, the SQL-function-body patch has ignored this advice totally. At the very least this comment needs to be adjusted, but I wonder if it's not telling us that \ef and/or \sf are broken. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: