Re: Schema version management
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Schema version management |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1342041031-sup-4511@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Schema version management (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Schema version management
Re: Schema version management |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié jul 11 17:03:03 -0400 2012: > > On tis, 2012-07-10 at 17:54 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > In general, NTFS forbids the use of these printable ASCII chars in > > filenames (see > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filename#Comparison_of_filename_limitations>: > > > > " * : < > ? \ / | > > > Many of these could be used in operators. > > Yeah, that's a bummer. Then I guess some escape mechanism would be OK. > I could imagine an operator < on a custom data type being dumped into a > file named operator_%3C.sql. Still better than putting them all in one > file. > > Of course, argument types need to be dealt with as well, just like with > functions (plus prefix/postfix). operator_!___numeric.sql (postfix, name does not need escape) operator_%7C%2F_integer__.sql (prefix) operator_%3C_bit_varying__bit_varying.sql (type name with spaces, changed to _) -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: