Re: Portability report: ninja
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Portability report: ninja |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1341951.1635828494@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Portability report: ninja (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2021-11-01 15:25:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Fortunately for my >> purposes here, it seems to work with fairly old Python --- I built >> successfully with python 2.6.2, though not with 2.4.1. > meson will need a newer python though... Yup. I was just trying to establish what the lower bound was for ninja, since they (ahem) don't document it. The meson docs say it needs Python >= 3.6, which I think is going to be an issue, but I've not researched it yet. What I was mainly curious about today was whether anything using ninja as the backend could meet our portability goals. My mind's more or less at ease on that, but I am afraid that requiring 3.6 is going to be a problem on LTS distributions. That's a topic for another thread though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: