Re: [Win32] Problem with rename()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Win32] Problem with rename() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13419.1145373488@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Win32] Problem with rename() ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: > Looking at our code, we have the comment: > /* These flags allow concurrent rename/unlink */ > (FILE_SHARE_READ | > FILE_SHARE_WRITE | FILE_SHARE_DELETE), > But I'm not sure that those flags actually guarantee that. They do allow > concurrent unlink, but not necessarily rename. I read elsewhere that it > should work, but can't find backing docs on MSDN. Seems it works in most > cases, but perhaps there are some where it doesn't? I think there are two different cases involved in rename: 1. Someone has a handle for the file-to-be-renamed; 2. Someone has a handle for the file that is to be deleted (ie currently has the name being renamed to). If #2 doesn't work then we've got serious problems. I think though that #1 can only occur in the context of WAL segment recycling, so we can probably work around it if that doesn't work. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: