Re: Schema version management

Excerpts from Aidan Van Dyk's message of sáb jul 07 11:32:33 -0400 2012:
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> > I have code in the wild that defines new operators and casts and has no
> > C code and is not in an extension and has no business being in an
> > extension.
>
> Nobody is claiming that pgdump shouldn't dump it.
>
> But, since you're using operators, what would you think is an
> appropriate name for the file the operator is dumped into?

I was thinking that it might make sense to group operators according to
the type(s) they operate on, somehow.  Using funny chars for names is
guaranteed to cause problems somewhere.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support