Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Mark JSON error detail messages for translation.
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Mark JSON error detail messages for translation. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1339535104-sup-6995@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Mark JSON error detail messages for translation. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Mark JSON error detail messages for translation.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 12 16:52:20 -0400 2012: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > >> I notice that there's an unfinished attempt to maintain a line_start > >> pointer; if that were carried through, we could imagine printing the > >> current line up to the point of an error, which might provide a > >> reasonable balance between verbosity and insufficient context. > >> ... > >> or perhaps better let it run to the end of the line: > > > I'm not sure I find that an improvement, but I'm open to what other > > people think. > > Anybody here besides the crickets? I think providing both partial line contents (so +1 for maintaining line_start carefully as required) and line number would be useful enough to track down problems. I am not sure about the idea of letting the detail run to the end of the line; that would be problematic should the line be long (there might not be newlines in the literal at all, which is not that unusual). I think it should be truncated at, say, 76 chars or so. For the case where you have a single } in a line, this isn't all that helpful; we could consider printing the previous line as well. But if you end up with } } then it's not that helpful either. I am not sure. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: