Re: remove dead ports?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: remove dead ports? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1336208394.13755.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: remove dead ports? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: remove dead ports?
Re: remove dead ports? Re: remove dead ports? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On fre, 2012-05-04 at 18:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > What's the grounds for asserting they were known not to work? Not > actual testing, I assume. There were either essential pieces missing (e.g., no shared library support, or no Makefile.port), or we had received reports in the past the platform doesn't work and won't be fixed anymore by the original supporter. > Furthermore, I would want to insist that a complainer provide a > buildfarm member as the price of us continuing to support an old > uncommon platform. Otherwise the apparent support is hollow. The BSDI > port was viable for us to support as long as Bruce was using it daily, > but with that gone, we need somebody else to be testing it. Based on these emerging criteria, should we also remove the other platforms on my original "marginal" list? irix osf sco irix and osf support was already dropped in Python 3.0, so probably their time is up.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: