Re: CLOG extension

Excerpts from Daniel Farina's message of jue may 03 17:04:03 -0400 2012:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Possibly.  I have some fear of ending up with too many background
> > processes, but we may need them.
>
> I sort of care about this, but only on systems that are not very busy
> and could otherwise get by with fewer resources -- for example, it'd
> be nice to turn off autovacuum and the stat collector if it really
> doesn't have to be around.  Perhaps a Nap Commander[0] process or
> procedure (if baked into postmaster, to optimize to one process from
> two) would do the trick?

I'm not sure I see the point in worrying about this at all.  I mean, a
process doing nothing does not waste much resources, does it?  Other
than keeping a PID that you can't use for other stuff.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support