Re: Archives policy
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Archives policy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1334170360-sup-2843@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Archives policy ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Archives policy
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Excerpts from Joshua D. Drake's message of jue abr 16 15:07:59 -0400 2009: > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 15:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > >> (and I don't think we're going to attempt to delete pornographic > > >> messages posted months ago -- if anything of the sort happens, action is > > >> going to be taken pretty hastily). > > > > > Agreed ... there isn't any reason why someone 'internally' doesn't notice > > > it from jus scanning the lists ... > > > > I think by far the most likely problem scenario is that someone claims > > to hold copyright on something-or-other in an old message and files a > > DMCA takedown notice against it. AFAICT the standard of proof in such > > cases is "guilty until proven innocent", so we'd probably have to cave > > rather than argue about it. How are the copyright laws in Canada these > > days? > > I think what we really need to do is stop playing attorney and ask one > what our exposure is. I will contact SFLC. I just got another guy requesting me to remove an archived email from very old archives. Nothing illegal so I'm not doing it. Still, I just reread this thread and saw this offer and no followup. JD, did you ever get around to asking SFLC about this? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: