Re: Faster compression, again
От | Huchev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Faster compression, again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1333463346346-5615311.post@n5.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Faster compression, again (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Faster compression, again
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
For a C implementation, it could interesting to consider LZ4 algorithm, since it is written natively in this language. In contrast, Snappy has been ported to C by Andy from the original C++ Google code, which lso translate into less extensive usage and tests. http://code.google.com/p/lz4/ Furthermode, LZ4 license is BSD. And it has been reported in several tests as being faster than Snappy/LZO, especially on decompression speed. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/15744 And last point, there is a "high compression" mode, which could be useful for data rarely written/modified but often read. http://code.google.com/p/lz4hc/ -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Faster-compression-again-tp5565675p5615311.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: