Re: WIP patch for plan invalidation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP patch for plan invalidation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13324.1173580474@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP patch for plan invalidation (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> Comments? > Why do CREATE/DROP/REINDEX DATABASE no longer call PreventTransactionChain? I moved those calls into ProcessUtility to avoid having to pass an extra argument to those functions. You could call this either way, but there was already precedent for doing PreventTransactionChain in ProcessUtility --- several existing commands did it that way. In the patch as it stands, ProcessUtility does it for every command in which the call is unconditional, and we only pass isTopLevel to command subroutines that have some condition or other affecting what to do. You could make about an equally good case for pushing all those PreventTransactionChain calls out to the subroutines, but it didn't really seem any prettier to do it that way. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: