Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1332176001.8435.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On sön, 2012-03-18 at 21:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > If we were going to change the output at all, I would vote for "CREATE > TABLE nnnn" so as to preserve the rowcount functionality. Keep in > mind though that this would force client-side changes, for instance in > libpq's PQcmdTuples(). Fixing that one routine isn't so painful, but > what of other client-side libraries, not to mention applications? Doesn't seem worth it to me. At least, "SELECT nnnn" makes some sense: nnnn rows were selected. "CREATE TABLE nnnn" means what? nnnn tables were created? What might make sense is to delegate this additional information to separate fields in a future protocol revision.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: