Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1330350691-sup-1@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: check constraint validation takes access exclusive locks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of lun feb 27 10:41:32 -0300 2012: > > 2012/2/27 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>: > > > > Excerpts from hubert depesz lubaczewski's message of lun feb 27 10:02:57 -0300 2012: > >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 03:04:28PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> > Hello > >> > > >> > I rechecked Depesz's article - > >> > http://www.depesz.com/2011/07/01/waiting-for-9-2-not-valid-checks/ > >> > > >> > The behave of current HEAD is different than behave described in article. > >> > > >> > "alter table a validate constraint a_a_check" needs a access exclusive > >> > locks and blocks table modification - I tested inserts. > > > >> yes, looks like we have revert to access exclusive lock: > > > > See commits > > 2c3d9db56d5d49bdc777b174982251c01348e3d8 > > and > > a195e3c34f1eeb6a607c342121edf48e49067ea9 > > this block a sense of NOT VALIDATE constraints. Yeah :-( > Is it final behave or will be fixed on 9.2? It's final for 9.2 AFAIK. It's supposed to get fixed during the 9.3 timeframe. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: