Re: Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1327704842-sup-5100@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup (Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Dry-run mode for pg_archivecleanup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Josh Kupershmidt's message of vie ene 27 19:43:51 -0300 2012: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > This email thread seems to have trailed off without reaching a > > conclusion. The patch is marked as Waiting on Author in the > > CommitFest application, but I'm not sure that's accurate. Can we try > > to nail this down? > > Perhaps my last email was a bit wordy. The only real change I am > suggesting for Gabriele's patch is that the message printed to stderr > when debug + dryrun are activated be changed to "would remove file > ..." from "removing file", i.e around line 124: > > if (debug) > fprintf(stderr, "%s: %s file \"%s\"\n", > progname, (dryrun ? "would remove" : "removing"), > WALFilePath); > > Other than that little quibble, I thought the patch was fine. If you do that, please make sure you use two complete separate strings instead of building one from spare parts. This bit is missing the _() stuff though. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: