Re: Guidelines on dropping objects in regression tests, sqlsmith
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Guidelines on dropping objects in regression tests, sqlsmith |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1327.1523761329@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Guidelines on dropping objects in regression tests, sqlsmith (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: Guidelines on dropping objects in regression tests, sqlsmith
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes: > I took a look through all of the SQL files that the INCLUDE covering > indexes patch added tests to. At no point do they leave behind any > INCLUDE indexes. I'll do something about that as part of the INCLUDE > patch that I'm working on at the moment. A quick look at the current final state of the regression database says regression=# select indexrelid::regclass, indrelid::regclass from pg_index where indnatts != indnkeyatts; indexrelid | indrelid ---------------------+------------- covidxpart1_a_b_idx | covidxpart1 covidxpart_a_b_idx | covidxpart covidxpart2_a_b_idx | covidxpart2 covidxpart3_a_b_idx | covidxpart3 covidxpart4_a_b_idx | covidxpart4 (5 rows) So we've got *some*, but it sure looks like they were all added by the patch to fix covering indexes for partitions. I'd want to see some for plain-table cases as well. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: