Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1324069097-sup-3090@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review: Non-inheritable check constraints
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Alex Hunsaker's message of vie dic 16 17:50:12 -0300 2011: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:06, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > > Yeah. Nikhil, Alex, this is the merged patch. Have a look that it > > still works for you (particularly the pg_dump bits) and I'll commit it. > > I adjusted the regression test a bit too. > > Other than the version checks seem to be off by one looks fine. I > assume I/we missed that in the original patch. I also adjusted the > version check in describe.c to be consistent with the other version > checks in that file (>= 90200 instead of > 90100). Uhm ... you're right that convalidated is present in 9.1 but AFAIR it's only used for FKs, not CHECKs which is what this code path is about (for CHECKs I only introduced it in 9.2, which is the patch that caused the merge conflict in the first place). FKs use a completely separate path in pg_dump which doesn't need the separate convalidated check. So I don't think we really need to add a separate branch for 9.1 here, but it certainly needs a comment improvement. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: