Re: should Makefile.custom be in source tree or in build tree?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: should Makefile.custom be in source tree or in build tree? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1323199147-sup-1273@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | should Makefile.custom be in source tree or in build tree? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: should Makefile.custom be in source tree or in build tree?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar dic 06 16:06:57 -0300 2011: > Makefile.custom is currently looked for in the source directory. This > tripped me up recently when doing a vpath build. Should it be looked > for in the build tree instead? Or both? Hmm, interesting question. When I have used it, I put it in the source dir without thinking much about it. In the builddir it'd be painful I think because it'd be gone when the builddir is zapped to do a full rebuild (I don't do this often but it does happen from time to time). Nowadays I don't use it much though, since I learned the PROFILE trick when calling make, so it's not like I care all that much. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: