Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1322820857.1658.16.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2011-11-30 at 10:53 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I think the important point here is that we need to support more than > one level of validation, and that the higher levels can't really be > applied by default in CREATE FUNCTION because they may fail on perfectly > valid code. How would this work with anything other than PL/pgSQL in practice? Here is an additional use case: There are a bunch of syntax and style checkers for Python: pylint, pyflakes, pep8, pychecker, and maybe more. I would like to have a way to use these for PL/Python. Right now I use a tool I wrote called plpylint (https://github.com/petere/plpylint), which pulls the source code out of the database and runs pylint on the client, which works well enough, but what is being discussed here could lead to a better solution. So what I'd like to have is some way to say check all plpythonu functions [in this schema or whatever] using checker "pylint" where "pylint" was previously defined as a checker associated with the plpythonu language that actually invokes some user-defined function. Also, what kind of report does this generate?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: