Re: revise a comment in CreateCheckPoint()

"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> writes:
> The original comment of why we are safe without protection of critical
> section is confusing.

I thought your version was even more so :-(.  I've applied the attached
patch instead.

            regards, tom lane

Index: xlog.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c,v
retrieving revision 1.187
diff -c -r1.187 xlog.c
*** xlog.c    17 Apr 2005 03:04:29 -0000    1.187
--- xlog.c    23 Apr 2005 18:48:45 -0000
***************
*** 4925,4931 ****
       *
       * This I/O could fail for various reasons.  If so, we will fail to
       * complete the checkpoint, but there is no reason to force a system
!      * panic.  Accordingly, exit critical section while doing it.
       */
      END_CRIT_SECTION();

--- 4925,4934 ----
       *
       * This I/O could fail for various reasons.  If so, we will fail to
       * complete the checkpoint, but there is no reason to force a system
!      * panic.  Accordingly, exit critical section while doing it.  (If
!      * we are doing a shutdown checkpoint, we probably *should* panic ---
!      * but that will happen anyway because we'll still be inside the
!      * critical section established by ShutdownXLOG.)
       */
      END_CRIT_SECTION();