Re: pgsql: Make pg_dumpall build with the right object files under MSVC.
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Make pg_dumpall build with the right object files under MSVC. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1322502320-sup-4904@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Make pg_dumpall build with the right object files under MSVC. (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Make pg_dumpall build with the right
object files under MSVC.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of lun nov 28 14:40:24 -0300 2011: > > On 11/28/2011 11:33 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > In summary, for those watching, pg_dump and pg_restore used to share > > OBJS, and with my new patch, dumpmem.c is now shared by those and > > pg_dumpall. Seems the MSVC code previously could not handle that case, > > which is fixed by this patch. > > Er, no. Only dumputils.c is shared with pg_dumpall. dumpmem.c is not > (see the Makefile). > > The problem that arose is that pg_dumpall has its own (non-static) > versions of pg_malloc and pg_strdup, so we got duplicate symbol errors > from the newly declared dumpmem.c functions when we erroneously tried > linking it in on MSVC. I was wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to have pg_dumpall supply its own version of exit_horribly to avoid separate pg_malloc and pg_strdup ... but then those routines are so tiny that it hardly makes a difference. Another thing I wondered when seeing the original commit is the fact that the old code passed the AH to exit_horribly in some places, whereas the new one simply uses NULL. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: