Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop orphan temp tables in single-mode
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop orphan temp tables in single-mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13209.1551972251@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop orphan temp tables in single-mode (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop orphan temp tables in single-mode
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > In a way I agree, but I think the reality is that some very large > percentage of people who enter single user mode do so because of a > wraparound-induced shutdown, and what they need is an easy way to get > the system back on line. Running a catalog query to look for > undropped temp tables and then dropping them one by one using DROP > TABLE is not what they want. They want to be able to run one or two > commands and get their database back on line. So if we think we can invent a "MAGICALLY FIX MY DATABASE" command, let's do that. But please let's not turn a well defined command like VACUUM into something that you don't quite know what it will do. I'm especially down on having squishy DWIM logic in a last-resort operating mode; the fact that some people only use it in a certain way is a poor excuse for setting booby traps for everybody. Something I could get behind as a less dangerous way of addressing this issue is to define DISCARD TEMP, in single-user mode, as dropping the contents of all temp schemas not just one. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: