Re: BUG #6269: Anomaly detection

Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
> Actually, since we (mostly you) found explanations for all the
> disallowed phenomena, with no PostgreSQL anomalies showing when
> using the corrected test code, I was going to call it done.  Well,
> except that I think some of your tests are interesting enough to ask
> whether it was OK to try to integrate some of the related SQL into
> C-based tests in the optional PostgreSQL regression tests.  (They
> probably run too long to include in the main "make check" set.)
> If I could get them running in that environment, I think they could
> stress a different-enough set of code paths to be worth including.
>
No problem at all to include my tests in the regression tests. I really like
the fact that this project of mine can contribute to PostgreSQL.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/BUG-6269-Anomaly-detection-tp4936233p4948383.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.