Re: improve ssl error code, 2147483650

Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 21.06.24 16:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Most of libpq gets at strerror_r via SOCK_STRERROR for Windows
>> portability.  Is that relevant here?

> Looking inside the OpenSSL code, it makes no efforts to translate 
> between winsock error codes and standard error codes, so I don't think 
> our workaround/replacement code needs to do that either.

Fair enough.

> Btw., our source code comments say something like 
> "ERR_reason_error_string randomly refuses to map system errno values." 
> The reason it doesn't is exactly that it can't do it while maintaining 
> thread-safety.

Ah.  Do you want to improve that comment while you're at it?

            regards, tom lane